Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Matteo Gigante vs Hernan Casanova Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Gigante vs Casanova analysis and find out who is favored!
Matteo Gigante vs Hernan Casanova Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Gigante 1 - 0 Casanova
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Gigante has won 50.36% of points on their second serve, while Casanova has won 47.15%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Gigante, in recent form, has won 51% of their opponent's second serve points, while Casanova has won 55.77%. The same stats for first serve returns are 34.85% and 37.96% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Gigante has saved 60.91% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Casanova has saved 57.52% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Gigante has won 63.24% of matches played (W/L 43/ 25), with Casanova winning 54.69% (W/L 35/ 29) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Gigante has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 77% (W/L 40/ 12), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 26% (W/L 7/ 20). Casanova has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 63% (W/L 452/ 263), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Player level: In the last year, Gigante has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 69.23% of matches (W/L 36/ 16), where as Casanova has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 47.5% of matches (W/L 19/ 21). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Gigante winning 1 times and Casanova being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Gigante winning 2 and Casanova winning 0. The last match between Gigante and Casanova was at the Cordenons Challenger, 11-08-2023, Quarterfinals, Clay with Matteo Gigante getting the victory 6-1 7-6(2).
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:29:44.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Gigante and Casanova have played a deciding set 0 times, with Gigante winning 0 times and Casanova 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Gigante winning 1, and Casanova 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Gigante has played against opponents with an average rank of 296.21 while Casanova has played against players with an average rank of 341.31.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Gigante has won 72% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Casanova has won 55% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Gigante has converted 43.59% of breakpoint opportunities, and Casanova has converted 52.69% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
138
Rank
137
High
22
Age
L
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
332
Rank
221
High
30
Age
R
Plays
W
L
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
Form
W
W
W
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
59% (127-87)
Career Total W/L
63% (458-271)
70% (26-11)
YTD W/L
60% (21-14)
$70,440
Career Prize Money
$17,445
2
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Matteo Gigante | Hernan Casanova |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 13 | 7 |
| Aces (Total) | 4 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 5 | 1 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:29:44 | 1:29:44 |
| 1st Serve % | 55% (45/82) | 80% (40/50) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 73% (33/45) | 57% (23/40) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 51% (19/37) | 50% (5/10) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 75% (3/4) | 14% (1/7) |
| Return Points W% | 44% (22/50) | 37% (30/82) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 7-6(2) |
Stats 
Matteo Gigante
Player
Hernan Casanova
55%
(
45 of
82)
1st Serve %
80%
(
40 of
50)
4
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
1
73%
(
33 of
45)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
51%
(
19 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
37%
(
30 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
22 of
50)
74
Total Points Won
58
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Matteo Gigante | Hernan Casanova |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 70% (26/11) | 60% (21/14) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 61% (53/34) | 57% (45/34) |
| Games Win/Loss | 54% (432/375) | 53% (384/335) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 86% (18/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 57% (8/6) | 60% (21/14) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.4 | 0.03 |
| Aces Total | 157 | 11 |
| DFs per game | 0.41 | 0.16 |
| DFs Total | 162 | 55 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:36:51 | 1:47:52 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 259.08 | 329.8 |
| 1st Serve % | 62% (1587/2572) | 75% (1742/2321) |
| 1st Serve W% | 69% (1096/1587) | 61% (1065/1742) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 50% (496/985) | 47% (273/579) |
| BPs Won% Total | 44% (119/273) | 53% (137/260) |
| Return Pts W% | 41% (1062/2582) | 45% (1040/2325) |
| Slam W/L | 50% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 40% (2/3) | 0% (0/1) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 84% (21/4) | 57% (12/9) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 69% (9/4) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 70% (26/37) | 60% (21/35) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 62% (8/13) | 50% (6/12) |
| Deciding Set W% | 92% (12/13) | 67% (6/9) |
| 1st set W, W | 95% (20/19) | 89% (19/17) |
| 1st set W, L | 5% (20/1) | 11% (19/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 41% (17/7) | 25% (16/4) |
Matteo Gigante Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Gustavo Heide
Player
Matteo Gigante
46%
(
28 of
61)
1st Serve %
65%
(
39 of
60)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
61%
(
20 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
33%
(
20 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
29 of
60)
70
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Matteo Gigante
Player
Dalibor Svrcina
67%
(
71 of
106)
1st Serve %
69%
(
72 of
104)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
63%
(
45 of
71)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
41 of
72)
63%
(
22 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
37%
(
39 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
45 of
104)
112
Total Points Won
98
|
4-6 6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Matteo Gigante
Player
Sascha Gueymard Wayenburg
66%
(
69 of
104)
1st Serve %
53%
(
53 of
100)
2
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
4
70%
(
48 of
69)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
42 of
53)
51%
(
18 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
23 of
47)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
37%
(
38 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
35 of
100)
101
Total Points Won
103
|
6-4 5-7 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Francesco Maestrelli
Player
Matteo Gigante
52%
(
38 of
73)
1st Serve %
61%
(
43 of
71)
12
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
3
87%
(
33 of
38)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
30 of
43)
43%
(
15 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
34%
(
25 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
31 of
71)
79
Total Points Won
65
|
7-6(2) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Matteo Gigante
Player
Gianluca Bellezza
70%
(
37 of
53)
1st Serve %
48%
(
25 of
52)
7
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
3
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
18 of
25)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
32%
(
17 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
24 of
52)
60
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Francisco Cerundolo
Player
Matteo Gigante
74%
(
32 of
43)
1st Serve %
47%
(
28 of
60)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
28%
(
12 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
33 of
60)
64
Total Points Won
39
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matteo Gigante
Player
Giulio Zeppieri
64%
(
50 of
78)
1st Serve %
53%
(
49 of
93)
4
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
0
70%
(
35 of
50)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
28 of
49)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
21 of
44)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
36%
(
28 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
44 of
93)
94
Total Points Won
77
|
7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Aleksandar Kovacevic
Player
Matteo Gigante
61%
(
36 of
59)
1st Serve %
45%
(
23 of
51)
4
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
32%
(
19 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
25 of
51)
65
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Roberto Carballes Baena
Player
Matteo Gigante
56%
(
14 of
25)
1st Serve %
47%
(
18 of
38)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
5
86%
(
12 of
14)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
12 of
18)
73%
(
8 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
5 of
25)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
41
Total Points Won
22
|
6-2 2-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Matteo Gigante
Player
Rudolf Molleker
75%
(
77 of
103)
1st Serve %
66%
(
65 of
98)
7
Aces
11
2
Double Faults
5
65%
(
50 of
77)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
49 of
65)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
36%
(
37 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
29 of
98)
95
Total Points Won
106
|
7-6(5) 0-6 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
view more
Hernan Casanova Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Juan Bautista Torres
Player
Hernan Casanova
75%
(
38 of
51)
1st Serve %
70%
(
49 of
70)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
61%
(
23 of
38)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
20 of
49)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
41%
(
7 of
17)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
43%
(
22 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
42 of
70)
71
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Hernan Casanova
Player
Dmitry Popko
66%
(
46 of
70)
1st Serve %
35%
(
27 of
78)
0
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
10
61%
(
28 of
46)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
19 of
27)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
21 of
51)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
44%
(
31 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
38 of
78)
77
Total Points Won
71
|
6-4 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Hernan Casanova
Player
Aziz Ouakaa
75%
(
54 of
72)
1st Serve %
51%
(
32 of
63)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
7
57%
(
31 of
54)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
10 of
31)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
44%
(
32 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
35 of
63)
75
Total Points Won
60
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jose Pereira
Player
Hernan Casanova
74%
(
69 of
93)
1st Serve %
73%
(
83 of
113)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
59%
(
41 of
69)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
40 of
83)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
38%
(
8 of
21)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
41%
(
38 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
56 of
113)
111
Total Points Won
95
|
6-7(4) 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Hernan Casanova
Player
Matias Soto
75%
(
40 of
53)
1st Serve %
59%
(
24 of
41)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
68%
(
27 of
40)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
38%
(
20 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
66%
(
27 of
41)
60
Total Points Won
34
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Andrea Collarini
Player
Hernan Casanova
68%
(
53 of
78)
1st Serve %
76%
(
58 of
76)
0
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
3
66%
(
35 of
53)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
40 of
58)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
3 of
18)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
38%
(
30 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
33 of
76)
81
Total Points Won
73
|
6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Hernan Casanova
Player
Valerio Aboian
80%
(
70 of
88)
1st Serve %
59%
(
44 of
75)
0
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
0
57%
(
40 of
70)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
29 of
44)
33%
(
6 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
60%
(
6 of
10)
48%
(
42 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
34 of
75)
80
Total Points Won
83
|
2-6 6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Hernan Casanova
Player
Ergi Kirkin
90%
(
46 of
51)
1st Serve %
59%
(
32 of
54)
0
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
61%
(
28 of
46)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
80%
(
4 of
5)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
37%
(
19 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
61
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Hernan Casanova
Player
Felix Corwin
82%
(
82 of
100)
1st Serve %
51%
(
46 of
91)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
6
70%
(
57 of
82)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
22 of
45)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
33%
(
33 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
41 of
91)
108
Total Points Won
83
|
6-3 6-7(8) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Hernan Casanova
Player
Igor Gimenez
78%
(
59 of
76)
1st Serve %
73%
(
61 of
84)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
68%
(
40 of
59)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
36 of
61)
76%
(
13 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
14 of
23)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
30%
(
23 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
34 of
84)
87
Total Points Won
73
|
3-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Gigante Vs Casanova Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
